Carry On is Carrying On

It took me all day to come up with that title.

Anyway it was reported this month that the British comedy franchise Carry On, is being ‘rebooted’ with two new films planned.

Do you remember in Little Britain when David Walliams played that guy Sebastian who was in love with the Prime Minister and he used to say “WHAAAAAT” in a really deep voice? Well that’s exactly what I did when I heard about this.

It’s terrible news! Of course I’m a Carry On fan – being British I was brought up on them like French kids are brought up on wine. And just so you know I don’t totally trust people who don’t find them funny. What? I’m being serious. But anyway, this is not a good idea.

The Carry On films are a mixed bag. They started off great but undeniably tailed off towards the end. The first Carry On was released in 1958 – Carry on Sergeant, sergeantactually my favourite of the franchise and a very quaint, very ‘British’ comedy.

The earlier films weren’t as racy as their better known counterparts from the late 60s. They were probably just as silly (and still camp) but with far less sexual innuendo, bedlam and boobs.

It also wasn’t until the 1960s that Sid James, Barbara Windsor, Jim Dale, Bernard Bresslaw and other actors joined the team, helping to create the ‘well known’ Carry On films that most of us are familiar with.


Kenneth Williams was involved right from the beginning with a role in Carry on Sergeant. He starred in more films than anyone – 26 in total. Definitely my favourite actor from the series, I don’t think a day goes by where I don’t do an ‘oooh hello’ in his style.

But by the mid 70s the series were at the end of their peak. They still made some watchable films but the standard was lower and a lot more crass, substituting actual good jokes for pure smut. One of them’s called Carry On Emmanuel for gods sake. And anyone who’s seen Carry on Girls will have one, very large, stand out memory….(well actually two of them).

No Carry Ons were made in the 80s but the franchise was briefly resurrected in 1992 with Carry on Columbus. Unsurprisingly it didn’t do well and was the last film they made.

And that’s why it’s such a dumb idea to try and recreate them now. It won’t work. The humour was very ‘of the time’ and a lot of appreciationooh-matron is for the actors who starred in them. We’re not really laughing at the words “ooh matron” but we are laughing at the way Kenneth Williams says it. They were silly, funny and harmlessly risque. There was a likable ‘cheapness’ about them, bad effects and downright ridiculous sound effects yet this only added to their charm, a bit like the old Doctor Who – and I can’t see any of this kitsch value, the stuff that made the films what they were, being carried into 2017/2018.

But hey, even if things were different and this was all quite exciting news and there WAS actually hope that these films would be pretty good – well here’s one last thing that I would call The Final Nail In The Coffin.

Complete confirmation that this idea is about as good as the one where you spray your groin with Lynx and set it on fire.

The names Tim Dawson and Susan Nickson might not mean much to you (or indeed anything) but the show they’re most famous for writing probably will – and could even induce cold sweats and the shakes – Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps.

AKA – ‘The Worst British Sitcom of All Time’. And you know I’m not a snob – I have no difficultly in admitting to any of the shit stuff I enjoy watching (which is quite a lot of stuff). It’s just horribly unfunny and crap, like the elevator music of comedy. Canned laughter aplenty. Type into Google ‘worst British sitcoms’, click on literally any link and you’ll find all you need to know about Two Pints of Lager and a Packet of Crisps.

And the fact that the two people responsible for it are writing the new Carry On films does not bode well at all. Who’s going to star in it, the cast of Hollyoaks?


About emmakwall

Films, books, soundtracks, good humour
This entry was posted in Miscellaneous, Random Writing and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to Carry On is Carrying On

  1. Kevin says:

    I have never seen these…but I’m intrigued (and no, not because of the boobs…well, not just because of the boobs :P). I might need to hunt these down, any recommended list?

  2. Natasha says:

    I hope they leave your comedy alone! Some things are just better left unspoiled 😦

  3. Yeah, this doesn’t sound good. I guess ‘wait and see’ is all we can do.

  4. Rebecca says:

    I wrote about the Carry On films for my dissertation, and this sounds AWFUL.

  5. table9mutant says:

    Oh dear. I’ve never seen a Carry On film. Can we still be friends, Emma?! ; )

    • emmakwall says:

      Haha, OF COURSE!!!!!!! #werulesister 🙂

      • table9mutant says:

        Yay! I’m still cool. ; ) lol. I’ll watch one someday!

        • emmakwall says:

          OF COURSE! I was going to reply “only if we can be best friends” but didn’t want to freak you out lol 🙂

          Hope you had a great weekend!! What’s with the weather today?! Grrr!

          • table9mutant says:

            Ha! Stalker! ; ) I did have a nice weekend but, holy shit – I’m off work today & planning to take the kid out for the day and WTF is going on outside?!?! It’s almost June, for crying out loud! Damn English weather (I’ve lived here long enough to bitch about it now). ; )

            • emmakwall says:

              That wasn’t me outside your house yesterday!!!!! 🙂

              Damn British weather indeed!!! It’s beyond a bloody joke!! Like you say, JUNE tomorrow!!!!!!! I hope you and your kid have a nice day all the same, what about cinema and Nandos? (nice of me to organise your day I know!)

            • table9mutant says:

              Ha! Nandos & the cinema are my idea of the PERFECT day out. ; ) I wore a winter coat today! A bloody WINTER coat!!!!!!!

  6. Richard says:

    Dreadful decision!

    It seems people in the film industry have run out of ideas, with the countless reboots, remakes, sequels, prequels and rip-offs. Leave the films be!

  7. MIB says:

    Times have changed too much for this idea to work.

    The reason we can still watch the originals is because of their legendary status and familiarity of the content, which may be dated and a little non-PC (okay a LOT non-PC) but they were never spiteful or overly coarse. Modern humour is either too sophisticated or flat out vulgar which is not the Carry On style. They tried that with “Carry On Emannuelle” and it bombed for good reason.

    As you say, the stalwart cast were also a huge part of the appeal and with only Babs Windsor and Jim Dale left alive there is frankly no-one in the modern world that can replicate the magic of Sid, Hattie, Kenny W, Kenny C, Joan, Bernie, Charlie etc. and nor should they.

    Bottom line: leave them alone! 😛

Any thoughts?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s